|
Author
|
Topic: Family Meetings
|
Eileen
Member
Member # 2
|
posted June 07, 2002 08:27 PM
I think that this is a difficult topic but recently I was met with skepticism by some regarding whether the "dreaded family meeting" is happening all the time; I know my family had it, and I have spoken to many, many other family members with loved ones in ARDS crisis and they go throught those meeting as well. In fact, I can't recall a family who did not have this sort of conversation with their loved one's doctors...regardless of the ultimate outcome. In talking about it, I had only tried to explain that I understood that it was probably a necessary conversation to have with many, if not most, ARDS patients, but I thought that it should be done with the most compassion possible. I was talking with some others and I thought that I would open up the conversation on the message board, try to get input from others. I think it is an important topic, since the perceptions vary widely. I hope that others will participate although I realize that this may be an uncomfortable topic for some. Again, nothing scientific...just thoughts and impressions about what you and your family members experienced. Thanks, Eileen PS I should add that my family had one such meeting...somewhere between the ten day and two week period on time after my diagnosis. It was the first time they were able to assemble all the pertinent parties involved in my care, hospital staff, etc., and they told them sadly that I was not expected to survive and that if I did, it was unlikely I would ever get off the vent. They said it was a quality of life issue and that they should consider removal from life support and that time. It was at this meeting that they first mentioned the possibility of brain damage as well. We had one doctor, a consulting physician from another hospital, who felt that they were writing me off too soon. [ June 09, 2002: Message edited by: Eileen ]
Posts: 2943 | From: | Registered: May 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
G. Bass
Member
Member # 56
Member Rated:
|
posted June 08, 2002 04:17 AM
Like Eileen, all of the families I have communicated with have had "the meeting(s)". I think this type of scenario is so common because ARDS is so unknown. For a doctor to offer the suggestion of removing life support, they must have to feel as if they have exausted all means of saving the patients life. With my mom, her initial pulmonary doctor (who was later removed) was a doom and gloomer from the get go. In hind sight, I think he knew to little about ARDS. When my mom was transferred to UCSF from our local hospital, I felt the staff was prepared to go the distance. They seemed confident that they could help her survive. Well, eventually those same doctors were calling for the family meeting to remove life support, different hospital, same story. Not once but twice during her 30 day stay there. They cited quality of life (which I hear so often) and all of the potential problems she would have if she was to survive ARDS. I felt like each time they asked us to consider removing life support my hope was loosing ground. I remember thinking so many times I was wrong for waiting. I wondered if I was doing it for personal reasons and perhaps just prolonging the obvious. Toward what appeared to be the final stages, I told myself that I would watch for multiple signs of failure, a steady decline in her condition, something to show me she was loosing her battle. When the doctors told us that her steroid treatment was not working, I think I was about to give in. It wasn't until those same doctors who had earlier called the meeting were now using terms like "guarded optimism" about her recovery, did I start to realize she was doing better than anyone expected. Today, over two years later, it all seems like yesterday. My mom is doing very well. Litterally nothing the doctors said would happen did. No wheelchair, no oxygen, no brain damage, no diminished quality of life. Her initial ten percent chance of survival appears to have been enough of a chance to get her through her battle. To be very honest, I am not sure if I would be in the position I am today if my mom had lost her battle with ARDS. As much as I thought I had prepared myself, I really do not know how I would have handled it if she had died. So many times I left her room thinking it would be my last time to touch her hand or to say goodbye. People ask me often about the "family meetings" and what to do. I always tell them not to make decisions based "solely" upon the doctors suggestions, make decisions based upon your heart and make sure your decision is one that you can live with. While doctors are indeed smart, there are things they cannot factor in to those survival odds, it's called a Miracle. And so far, every ARDS survivor I have known, has been called "A Miracle" by the same doctor who gave the speech at those family meetings. My wish is that someday more doctors will have family meetings that speak of these miracles that we all know do happen.
Posts: 149 | From: | Registered: Aug 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
Member # 1
|
posted June 08, 2002 04:17 PM
Hi, I'm Beth Tuten, Asheville, NC, 39, ARDS Survivor, July, 2000. The doctors had the talk with my family almost on a daily basis. They would discuss the possibility of death, but they always kept them hopeful, and they prayed with them everyday.Also, on a different twist, I have two children who were 9 & 13 at the time of my ARDS crisis. Our doctor consulted with a children's psycotherapist who helped her prepare to "talk" to our children. After I came home I asked the children to tell me what the doctor had told them. They said she explained that my lungs & heart were sick. They were doing everything they could to help me and I was sleeping so I could try to get stronger. She said she knew I wanted to come home to them, and if there was any way I could, I surely would. But, there was a chance that I might have to go to heaven if my body could not get better here on earth. She cried with them and she prayed with them. She gave them as much medical information as was appropriate, explaining the machines, and the ventilator so they would not be as frightened when they saw me. The ICU nurses were also a God send, as they helped my children and other families try to make sense of a senseless situation. My sister kept a journal, as did my husband. They both referenced the "talks" with the doctors and the "talk" with the children. Although the gravity of the situation was certainly addressed, they were told constantly, "Don't ever give up
Posts: 541 | From: | Registered: May 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
admin
Administrator
Member # 1
|
posted June 09, 2002 06:25 AM
Anne states: I don't believe we had the dreaded family meeting while our daughter had ARDS. She was vented for 17 days, and only during the last 10 days were the doctor's calling the problem ARDS. The ICU of our Children's Hospital in Canada encourages parents to stay as long as they wish, and in our case, it meant that she had at least one of us there 24/7. Each day the doctor's and residents started with rounds at bedside, and parents were encouraged to participate, and questions were welcomed. My husband and I recognized that she was improving, when she was no longer the first case of the day! [ June 09, 2002: Message edited by: admin ]
Posts: 541 | From: | Registered: May 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eileen
Member
Member # 2
|
posted October 17, 2002 07:59 PM
Just keep remembering that where there is life, there is hope. Your sister is young...she has children to live for, to fight for. I had, according to my doc, five of those touch and go episodes when he was on duty, so help her to fight when it is harder to fight for herself. There are survivors on this site who were on the vent for a long time...I was on for eight weeks...and it is not that unusual. Others who were on longer, or shorter, and there are those of us that have little post ARDS complications. So, don't let the projections or complications that may or may not come to be scare you. Worry about what might happen when the time comes and takes things step by step, moment by moment. I am not saying that some people do not have problems, but minute by minute, day by day.... First they said I would not survive, but I did. Then they said I would never get off the vent, but I did. Take it minute by minute if you have to. Take tapes of the voices of those babies to help her to fight. I will be thinking about your sister and keep her in my thoughts and prayers.
Posts: 2943 | From: | Registered: May 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nikroo
Member
Member # 252
Rate Member
|
posted May 05, 2003 09:14 AM
Robert, ask lots of questions, even if they don't want to step on toes, who says you can't. I know how that is, my family went through the same thing with me, the nurses would not contact the Dr because they didn't want to "step on toes", and so, my condition rapidly deteriorated, but, had we all been a little stronger, and not trusted so much, maybe we would have ended up in a different place. Trust your gut instinct Robert!!
Posts: 44 | From: | Registered: Feb 2003 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Eileen
Member
Member # 2
|
posted September 24, 2003 12:55 PM
Article based on Canadian study... is this your experience? I hope it is. I will try to locate the study which emphasizes the criteria that should be looked at:Determinants of Ventilator Withdrawal in Critically Ill Patients Have Changed http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/461716?mpid=18802 By Anthony J. Brown, MD NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Sept 18 - In the past, the decision to stop mechanical ventilation in a critically ill patient was primarily based on objective data, such as illness severity and organ dysfunction. New study findings suggest that this has changed and that physicians now base the decision on what they believe the patient wants and on their likely outcome. "Studies from a couple of decades ago have suggested that patient age and organ dysfunction were major factors influencing withdrawal of life support," lead author Dr. Deborah Cook, from McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada, told Reuters Health. Also, such support typically "wasn't withdrawn until after many weeks in the ICU." In the new study, which was published in the September 18th issue of The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), "we wanted to see whether or not things had changed since these studies were reported," Dr. Cook noted. Instead of increased age and illness severity, "we found that more patient-centered factors were the main determinants of ventilator withdrawal," Dr. Cook stated. Specifically, "if the physician believed the patient didn't want life support or if they thought their chance of survival in the ICU was less than 10% then withdrawal was more likely," Other predictors of ventilator withdrawal included the physician's perception that future cognitive function would be severely impaired and the use of vasopressors or inotropes. The findings are based on a study of 851 critically ill patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation in ICUs in Canada, the US, Sweden, or Australia. Of the various determinants identified, the physician's perception of the patient's desire for life support was the strongest. When the physician believed that the patient wanted no life support, ventilator withdrawal was 4.2 times more likely. In contrast with the older studies, patients typically spent just a few days on mechanical ventilation, the findings show. The new findings may indicate that physicians are communicating better with critically ill patients, Dr. Cook observed. Physicians seem to be "paying more attention to conversations with the patient and their family rather than looking at some scoring system that tallies up injury severity," she added. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1123-1132.
Posts: 2943 | From: | Registered: May 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|